Amy Coney Barrett, who has 7 kids, took issue with the idea that blocking content is a workable approach. And Sam Alito noted parents often aren't tech savvy.
In particular, they’re directing their ire towards Amy Coney Barrett ... Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. But when it comes bucking Tr*mp, Barrett is more willing than her conservative peers.
In the first test of how receptive the court may be to Trump, 4 of the court's 6 conservative members said they would have granted his emergency request.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was appointed by Trump to the high court in 2020, cast the deciding vote along with the court’s liberals and Chief Justice John Roberts.
A recent call between conservative Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito and President-elect Donald Trump has drawn sharp criticism, with former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance calling it "entirely ...
The Supreme Court allowed for Manhattan Judge Juan M. Merchan's decision on Friday after rejecting Trump's request to halt the proceeding in a 5-4 decision on Thursday. Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Coney Barrett, broke with conservatives to side with the court's three liberal justices.
Two Republican appointees, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett, joined the court’s three liberals in ordering the president-elect to face sentencing on Friday.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard the first major First Amendment case involving pornography — or, for that matter, sexual speech of any kind — in more than two decades. It’s also the first such case since Republicans gained a 6-3 supermajority on the
Supreme Court heard a case about age-verification laws,Free Speech v. Paxton. Its decision will significantly impact online free speech. Age-verification law
() − The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, a pivotal case that could reshape online free speech and child protection laws
In their attempt to determine whether the Texas law is constitutional, the justices cited antiquated instances of accessing porn
Democrats want you to believe that the U.S. Supreme Court is there to do whatever Donald Trump wants. Justice Barrett proves that's not the case.