The fight over AI summaries is part of a larger struggle playing out in newsrooms figuring out where human editors still fit in.

Wikipedia's plan to roll out AI summaries wasn’t the only thing editors had gripes about, though. Wikipedia has in some ways become a byword for sober boringness, which is excellent.

Wikipedia is literally Generative Human Intelligence. There's no unqiue research, thoughts, or conclusions in there. It's a human-generated response to a request for information that uses other ...

The major underlying theme of the replies, though, was that AI summaries had the potential to seriously undermine the trust that Wikipedia had built up over its 24 years of operation.

The latest Grok controversy is revealing not for the extremist outputs, but for how it exposes a fundamental dishonesty in AI ...

Wikipedia halts its AI summary rollout after human editors raise concerns about credibility. Wikipedia has long allowed its (human) users to add and edit entries. Recently, it rolled out AI summaries ...

Wikipedia has revealed its new AI strategy for the next three years — and it doesn't involve replacing its community with AI, thankfully.

Wikimedia will integrate generative AI into Wikipedia services. AI will assist in reducing the workload for human editors and volunteers. Focus will be on enhancing quality control and technical ...

The Wikimedia Foundation and Google's data science platform Kaggle are offering AI developers a dataset of information from Wikipedia they can freely use.

I mean the entire DRAW of Wikipedia is their reliability and their editor culture of verifying data to some level of a standard. AI can't do that, is incapable of doing that, so the editors would ...